senseigarret1
Joined 18-03-2021
28,712,681 score to level 48
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,413 0pp
- Accuracy #14,252 90.11%
- Plays #5,027 1,850
- Level #3,322 47.35
- Ranked score #4,534 301,623,172
- Total score #5,930 696,967,319
- Medals #127 11
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,453 466
- Account age #52,979 #21,906,496
- #1s #238 1
- Weighted pp #3,503 27pp
- Average pp #2,316 27pp
- Average SR #2,635 3.06*
- Average accuracy #1,658 96.64%
- Average score #3,381 1,464,847
- Total score #4,109 1,464,847
- Oldest #1 #3,479 Suzuki Konomi - Missing Promise (TV Size) [Intermediate] (28-09-2022)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
11 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 1/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 8/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.