nextlevel_old

Joined 17-12-2012

Level 60 44%

40,356,081 score to level 61

Global
#877,659
Country
#2,680
peak #424 26 Dec 2014
pp
990pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#244 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
154,872,954
Hit accuracy
91.24%
Play count
4,188
Play time
53h
Total score
1,454,143,921
Total hits
653,859
Maximum combo
852
Replays watched by others
1
Medals
6
Highest rank
#555,603
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
4
A
43
About
read 19d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
2
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
281
Global rank, 90 days

today #857,505

Play history
Replays watched

Swiss ranks

Medals

6 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 1/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 0/13

Skill & Dedication 5/96

Rank history

18-09-2026 #877,659

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #5,001

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.