oge_old
Joined 06-01-2010
25,806,006 score to level 61
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 32
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,415 0pp
- Accuracy #1,276 97.86%
- Plays #3,179 4,900
- Level #2,333 60.62
- Ranked score #3,619 464,809,749
- Total score #4,152 1,468,693,996
- Medals #136 2
- Replays watched #176 9
- Maps played #2,784 135
- Account age #104 #227,855
- #1s #211 32
- Weighted pp #1,067 399pp
- Average pp #3,023 20pp
- Average SR #4,008 2.44*
- Average accuracy #1,441 97.01%
- Average score #3,790 1,175,519
- Total score #1,142 37,616,598
- Oldest #1 #12 Nam Goo-min - Good evening, Narvik [Normal] (17-01-2010)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
2 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 1/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.