Nexux_rl4

Joined 02-05-2021

Level 50 73%

13,586,512 score to level 51

Global
#840,226
Country
#2,575
peak #4,762 11 Sept 2026
pp
1,062pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#243 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
65,349,070
Hit accuracy
89.37%
Play count
3,753
Play time
56h
Total score
857,663,488
Total hits
506,320
Maximum combo
541
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
10
Highest rank
#833,838
SS
0
SS
1
S
0
S
4
A
21
About
read 11d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
1
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
520
Global rank, 90 days

today #839,534

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

10 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 3/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 1/13

Skill & Dedication 6/96

Rank history

18-09-2026 #840,226

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #4,941

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.