Sinaos
Joined 11-02-2013
3,354,305 score to level 19
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,589 0pp
- Accuracy #24,600 85.50%
- Plays #6,510 349
- Level #6,071 18.44
- Ranked score #21,148 7,286,502
- Total score #17,882 40,535,695
- Medals #138 1
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,908 14
- Account age #2,683 #2,355,256
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #5,369 2pp
- Average pp #5,357 2pp
- Average SR #5,118 1.92*
- Average accuracy #4,376 86.10%
- Average score #4,938 506,262
- Total score #5,029 506,262
- Oldest #1 #331 Makishima Yuki, Yoshikawa Yukako & Fujita Saki - Kiseki no Kakera [Normal] (12-02-2013)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
1 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 0/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.