Layra_old
Joined 25-01-2010
8,617,641 score to level 46
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,540 0pp
- Accuracy #3,095 96.33%
- Plays #3,707 3,803
- Level #3,450 45.78
- Ranked score #7,282 109,817,209
- Total score #6,211 629,632,359
- Medals #137 2
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,799 126
- Account age #112 #243,525
- #1s #243 1
- Weighted pp #5,052 5pp
- Average pp #4,971 5pp
- Average SR #5,401 1.67*
- Average accuracy #1,596 96.73%
- Average score #5,019 460,528
- Total score #5,090 460,528
- Oldest #1 #19 Megumi Hayashibara & Masami Okui - Get Along [Easy] (15-02-2010)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
2 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 0/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 2/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.