mxggasays
Joined 18-07-2021
8,798,393 score to level 39
- Global
- #942,963
- pp
- 878pp
- Swiss #1s
- 3
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #2,844 878pp
- Global rank #2,858 #942,963
- Accuracy #33,052 81.57%
- Plays #4,636 2,338
- Level #4,063 38.85
- Ranked score #8,359 78,892,965
- Total score #7,616 383,445,595
- Medals #121 17
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,589 331
- Account age #59,808 #24,775,236
- #1s #240 3
- Weighted pp #3,683 23pp
- Average pp #4,483 8pp
- Average SR #2,976 2.86*
- Average accuracy #4,473 84.91%
- Average score #3,673 1,260,337
- Total score #3,129 3,781,010
- Oldest #1 #5,256 Anton Vinogradov - Ot vinta! (Cut Ver.) [Take's Normal] (14-06-2026)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
17 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 8/96
Beatmaps
The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.
Fujiwara Chika (CV: Kohara Konomi) - Chikatto Chika Chika (TV Size) 5 difficulties- Mapper
- Lami
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 5.36*
- Plays
- 45,379,557
- Favourites
- 23,756
- Ranked
- 14-03-2019
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.