alessya

Joined 27-07-2021

Level 27 6%

13,934,732 score to level 28

Global
#1,615,820
Country
#4,712
peak #13,568 21 Jul 2025
pp
220pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#237 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
17,084,766
Hit accuracy
87.85%
Play count
1,049
Play time
15h
Total score
128,445,268
Total hits
100,621
Maximum combo
369
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
6
Highest rank
#1,485,772
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
4
A
16
About
read 20d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
0
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
157
Global rank, 90 days

today #1,568,882

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

6 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 1/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 0/13

Skill & Dedication 4/96

Rank history

19-09-2026 #1,615,820

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #14,524

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.