Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,414 0pp
- Accuracy #3,814 95.78%
- Plays #2,038 8,780
- Level #910 89.78
- Ranked score #1,549 1,823,001,647
- Total score #2,154 4,836,531,039
- Medals #121 17
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #1,922 1,015
- Account age #3,035 #2,522,291
- #1s #243 1
- Weighted pp #5,333 3pp
- Average pp #5,316 3pp
- Average SR #5,316 1.77*
- Average accuracy #4,512 84.30%
- Average score #4,184 940,183
- Total score #4,544 940,183
- Oldest #1 #348 marble - Suisai Candy [Easy] (09-04-2013)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
17 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 1/13
Skill & Dedication 12/96
Beatmaps
The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.
MasaraP/masara & ran. - Love10 feat. Juunana 3 difficulties- Mapper
- handsome
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 4.18*
- Plays
- 569,463
- Favourites
- 398
- Ranked
- 16-09-2016
Sakakibara Yui - Dokidoki kokoro flavor 4 difficulties- Mapper
- Minakami Yuki
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 3.62*
- Plays
- 467,267
- Favourites
- 374
- Ranked
- 13-04-2016
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.































































































































































































































































































































































