N1r0W

Joined 09-08-2021

Level 56 20%

50,441,977 score to level 57

Global
#608,422
Country
#1,852
peak #2,978 30 May 2024
pp
1,620pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#239 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
194,873,124
Hit accuracy
93.02%
Play count
4,327
Play time
58h
Total score
1,167,838,023
Total hits
561,093
Maximum combo
598
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
21
Highest rank
#556,400
SS
0
SS
8
S
1
S
42
A
88
About
read 19d ago
Playstyle
keyboard, tablet
Followers
2
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
436
Global rank, 90 days

today #595,276

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

21 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 5/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 5/13

Skill & Dedication 10/96

Rank history

18-09-2026 #608,422

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #3,128

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.