me_l_v_in

Joined 20-08-2021

Level 52 87%

6,587,810 score to level 53

Global
#995,577
Country
#3,046
peak #4,656 24 Nov 2022
pp
858pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#242 in CH
Also world #1
0
#8 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
144,225,137
Hit accuracy
92.52%
Play count
3,280
Play time
51h
Total score
971,792,190
Total hits
450,057
Maximum combo
677
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
18
Highest rank
#845,435
SS
0
SS
12
S
0
S
23
A
61
About
read 65d ago
Playstyle
mouse, keyboard
Followers
2
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
422

Beatmapsets: 1 favourites

Global rank, 90 days
Play history
Replays watched

Swiss ranks

Medals

18 of 353

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/23

Hush-Hush 1/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 7/13

Skill & Dedication 9/96

Beatmaps

The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.

  • Egzod - Lone Wolf 1 difficulty
    Status
    graveyard
    Hardest
    4.23*
    Plays
    514
    Favourites
    3
    Ranked
    -
Rank history
Monthly pp since 2014

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

The figure is what the play was worth when it became the best, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A record changes hands when a play beats it, or when a rework re-prices everything and a different play comes out on top - those are marked. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.