Kraazy_old
Joined 27-04-2013
95,410,516 score to level 72
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 13
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,434 0pp
- Accuracy #306 98.90%
- Plays #3,678 3,852
- Level #1,743 71.06
- Ranked score #3,272 556,062,415
- Total score #3,262 2,366,870,930
- Medals #134 4
- Replays watched #182 3
- Maps played #2,588 331
- Account age #3,226 #2,587,037
- #1s #227 13
- Weighted pp #1,218 315pp
- Average pp #2,066 31pp
- Average SR #3,504 2.64*
- Average accuracy #305 98.90%
- Average score #3,306 1,527,023
- Total score #1,594 19,851,297
- Oldest #1 #388 Wang Qiang - Qiu Tian Bu Hui Lai [Normal] (30-06-2013)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
4 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 3/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.