Ellesar_old
Joined 11-02-2010
2,706,565 score to level 26
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 3
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,525 0pp
- Accuracy #1,112 98.02%
- Plays #6,159 677
- Level #5,343 25.72
- Ranked score #8,597 74,013,216
- Total score #12,376 111,043,435
- Medals #137 2
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,910 11
- Account age #120 #259,780
- #1s #237 3
- Weighted pp #4,242 14pp
- Average pp #4,989 5pp
- Average SR #5,250 1.83*
- Average accuracy #2,512 94.92%
- Average score #5,194 358,937
- Total score #4,431 1,076,811
- Oldest #1 #21 Mount Sims - How We Do [Easy] (05-03-2010)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
2 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 1/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.