Squid_Gamer167
Joined 23-11-2021 Was Slush_ngr_hater
58,552,463 score to level 65
- Global
- #489,434
- pp
- 2,022pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #1,567 2,022pp
- Global rank #1,572 #489,434
- Country rank #1,571 #1,571
- Accuracy #3,518 96.00%
- Plays #3,255 4,711
- Level #2,123 64.29
- Ranked score #3,540 481,702,348
- Total score #3,821 1,751,047,561
- Medals #108 30
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #1,966 962
- Account age #65,646 #27,367,064
- #1s #236 2
- Weighted pp #2,733 55pp
- Average pp #2,245 28pp
- Average SR #1,378 3.89*
- Average accuracy #4,116 88.23%
- Average score #3,499 1,377,293
- Total score #3,466 2,754,585
- Oldest #1 #4,035 Atarayo - "Boku wa..." (TV Size) [Hard] (21-05-2024)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
Could not load the medals: Too many requests, retry in ~1s.
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.