spinel05
Joined 19-03-2022
625,450 score to level 40
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,425 0pp
- Accuracy #33,292 81.44%
- Plays #4,463 2,546
- Level #3,957 39.97
- Ranked score #7,843 91,910,030
- Total score #7,346 417,974,550
- Medals #121 17
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,632 287
- Account age #69,469 #29,257,859
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #4,209 14pp
- Average pp #3,613 14pp
- Average SR #2,394 3.21*
- Average accuracy #4,901 77.12%
- Average score #4,507 756,273
- Total score #4,744 756,273
- Oldest #1 #3,417 Shimamiya Eiko - Naraku no Hana (TV Size) [fooders' Hyper] (03-08-2022)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
17 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 4/13
Skill & Dedication 8/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.