Freadx_10

Joined 02-06-2022

Level 41 76%

8,159,141 score to level 42

Global
#994,058
Country
#2,907
peak #5,895 2 Oct 2024
pp
797pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#236 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
171,385,774
Hit accuracy
89.57%
Play count
1,063
Play time
24h
Total score
476,870,859
Total hits
192,670
Maximum combo
1,195
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
17
Highest rank
#934,220
SS
0
SS
1
S
0
S
23
A
37
About
read 20d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
2
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
238
Global rank, 90 days

today #969,335

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

17 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 2/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64

Mod Introduction 3/13

Skill & Dedication 10/96

Rank history

19-09-2026 #994,058

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #6,039

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.