Benjy1997
Joined 27-07-2013
2,772,328 score to level 41
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,537 0pp
- Accuracy #1,065 98.06%
- Plays #4,784 2,146
- Level #3,871 40.91
- Ranked score #6,553 137,499,897
- Total score #7,152 448,227,672
- Medals #132 7
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,746 179
- Account age #4,237 #3,028,012
- #1s #237 2
- Weighted pp #4,141 16pp
- Average pp #4,505 8pp
- Average SR #5,303 1.79*
- Average accuracy #1,211 97.34%
- Average score #4,410 814,597
- Total score #4,035 1,629,193
- Oldest #1 #748 Lia - Tori no Uta [Easy] (01-02-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
7 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 5/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.