TotoSakigami_old
Joined 09-08-2013
127,448,349 score to level 90
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 38
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,411 0pp
- Accuracy #605 98.53%
- Plays #1,636 10,962
- Level #930 89.30
- Ranked score #2,756 751,390,132
- Total score #2,179 4,748,798,101
- Medals #132 6
- Replays watched #162 23
- Maps played #2,364 554
- Account age #4,397 #3,098,945
- #1s #200 38
- Weighted pp #829 628pp
- Average pp #2,021 32pp
- Average SR #2,884 2.90*
- Average accuracy #576 98.36%
- Average score #4,205 928,456
- Total score #1,180 35,281,322
- Oldest #1 #416 Inoue Marina - Watashi no Ki.Mo.Chi (TV Size) [Easy] (01-09-2013)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
6 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 4/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.