tinydem0n
Joined 25-01-2023 Was friendlycat
8,948,716 score to level 22
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 3
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,409 0pp
- Accuracy #23,115 86.13%
- Plays #6,526 297
- Level #5,802 21.00
- Ranked score #11,069 39,891,780
- Total score #15,572 59,581,284
- Medals #127 11
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,733 184
- Account age #75,892 #32,652,475
- #1s #236 3
- Weighted pp #4,204 14pp
- Average pp #4,967 5pp
- Average SR #4,384 2.29*
- Average accuracy #4,413 85.61%
- Average score #3,774 1,185,826
- Total score #3,190 3,557,478
- Oldest #1 #4,405 toby fox - Home (Omekyu Piano Cover) [arutama's Normal] (13-02-2025)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
11 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 8/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.