CeranamiOSU

Joined 01-06-2023

Level 35 18%

20,360,561 score to level 36

Global
#1,307,119
Country
#3,853
peak #9,609 26 Aug 2026
pp
426pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
44,992,159
Hit accuracy
89.09%
Play count
1,473
Play time
21h
Total score
284,139,439
Total hits
129,843
Maximum combo
697
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
22
Highest rank
#1,124,316
SS
0
SS
6
S
0
S
13
A
9
About
read 18d ago
Playstyle
mouse, keyboard
Followers
0
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
148
Global rank, 90 days

today #1,275,965

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

22 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 2/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 9/13

Skill & Dedication 10/96

Rank history

17-09-2026 #1,307,119

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #9,616

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.