jana_lbf

Joined 08-06-2023

Level 12 18%

2,454,701 score to level 13

Global
#1,931,623
Country
#5,229
peak #20,456 26 Aug 2026
pp
113pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
3,730,400
Hit accuracy
80.04%
Play count
119
Play time
3h
Total score
11,325,299
Total hits
12,814
Maximum combo
232
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
4
Highest rank
#1,952,850
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
1
A
6
About
read 37d ago
Playstyle
mouse, keyboard
Followers
1
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
29
Global rank, 90 days

today #1,829,205

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

4 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 0/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 1/13

Skill & Dedication 3/96

Rank history

06-10-2026 #1,931,623

Monthly pp since 2014

01-10-2026 #20,637

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.