MaelZamo
Joined 22-07-2023
34,711,614 score to level 51
- Global
- #697,474
- pp
- 1,374pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #2,131 1,374pp
- Global rank #2,139 #697,474
- Country rank #2,138 #2,138
- Accuracy #10,222 92.00%
- Plays #3,853 3,495
- Level #3,087 50.31
- Ranked score #6,416 143,508,947
- Total score #5,439 836,538,386
- Medals #114 24
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,322 594
- Account age #78,859 #34,116,371
- #1s #239 1
- Weighted pp #4,239 14pp
- Average pp #3,673 14pp
- Average SR #1,223 4.06*
- Average accuracy #4,643 82.23%
- Average score #2,034 2,801,704
- Total score #3,454 2,801,704
- Oldest #1 #3,942 isui - Suisei ni Nareta nara [Stompy's Hard] (15-03-2024)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
24 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 7/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 6/13
Skill & Dedication 9/96
Beatmaps
The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.
Komiya Mao - (can you) understand me? 7 difficulties- Mapper
- Revialink
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 5.12*
- Plays
- 5,992,335
- Favourites
- 2,031
- Ranked
- 01-11-2016
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.