radbits
Joined 02-12-2023
14,719,882 score to level 30
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 7
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,402 0pp
- Accuracy #17,876 88.40%
- Plays #6,220 602
- Level #4,995 29.13
- Ranked score #8,174 83,383,530
- Total score #10,780 160,730,118
- Medals #125 13
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,741 175
- Account age #80,469 #34,900,574
- #1s #233 7
- Weighted pp #3,517 27pp
- Average pp #4,840 6pp
- Average SR #3,965 2.46*
- Average accuracy #4,538 83.81%
- Average score #3,953 1,080,743
- Total score #2,418 7,565,203
- Oldest #1 #4,144 Olivia Rodrigo - get him back! [alevi's normal] (23-07-2024)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
13 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 3/13
Skill & Dedication 6/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.