leonpano

Joined 20-04-2024

Level 22 56%

4,289,637 score to level 23

Global
-
Country
-
peak #16,579 14 Mar 2025
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#244 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
16,198,402
Hit accuracy
87.29%
Play count
403
Play time
8h
Total score
74,140,363
Total hits
36,180
Maximum combo
427
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
8
Highest rank
#1,386,136
SS
0
SS
2
S
0
S
6
A
2
About
read 27d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
3
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
124
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #1,786,908

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

8 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 2/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 1/13

Skill & Dedication 5/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #18,614

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.