vikuzzzchik

Joined 10-06-2024

Level 34 15%

19,812,072 score to level 35

Global
#1,293,317
Country
#3,815
peak #8,951 2 Jan 2025
pp
438pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#239 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
58,222,905
Hit accuracy
94.14%
Play count
944
Play time
15h
Total score
259,837,928
Total hits
104,532
Maximum combo
566
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
16
Highest rank
#1,139,172
SS
0
SS
4
S
1
S
14
A
23
About
read 19d ago
Playstyle
mouse
Followers
4
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
116
Global rank, 90 days

today #1,262,598

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

16 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 5/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 3/13

Skill & Dedication 7/96

Rank history

17-09-2026 #1,293,317

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #9,416

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.