Lisaya_old
Joined 24-11-2013
16,416,748 score to level 33
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,537 0pp
- Accuracy #208 99.03%
- Plays #6,071 765
- Level #4,686 32.21
- Ranked score #6,369 146,997,676
- Total score #9,599 217,663,252
- Medals #136 3
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,628 297
- Account age #5,572 #3,647,901
- #1s #237 2
- Weighted pp #4,354 13pp
- Average pp #4,753 6pp
- Average SR #5,340 1.75*
- Average accuracy #574 98.37%
- Average score #4,992 476,302
- Total score #4,549 952,603
- Oldest #1 #768 Tokyo Mew Mew - Koi wa a la Mode [Easy] (19-02-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
3 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 2/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.