Codexbk201

Joined 05-10-2024

Level 34 89%

2,347,099 score to level 35

Global
#1,161,535
Country
#3,289
peak #7,465 26 Aug 2026
pp
587pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#244 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
87,956,357
Hit accuracy
81.70%
Play count
403
Play time
9h
Total score
277,302,901
Total hits
92,566
Maximum combo
1,073
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
8
Highest rank
#1,095,832
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
0
A
5
About
read 27d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
0
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
123
Global rank, 90 days

today #1,121,825

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

8 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 1/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 1/13

Skill & Dedication 5/96

Rank history

26-09-2026 #1,161,535

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #7,470

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.