luvrgowon
Joined 18-04-2025
1,311,081 score to level 15
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,579 0pp
- Accuracy #18,843 87.99%
- Plays #6,754 105
- Level #6,440 14.67
- Ranked score #18,686 10,273,500
- Total score #22,487 20,038,919
- Medals #117 22
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,853 71
- Account age #86,888 #37,772,673
- #1s #241 2
- Weighted pp #3,940 19pp
- Average pp #4,264 10pp
- Average SR #5,284 1.81*
- Average accuracy #1,812 96.36%
- Average score #4,650 674,637
- Total score #4,221 1,349,274
- Oldest #1 #4,491 Pedro Silva - Tee-hee Time [Normal] (19-04-2025)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
22 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 4/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 8/13
Skill & Dedication 8/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.