st0ni_old
Joined 30-12-2013
4,357,278 score to level 28
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,589 0pp
- Accuracy #14,173 90.14%
- Plays #6,157 703
- Level #5,147 27.70
- Ranked score #13,940 22,381,788
- Total score #11,443 138,022,722
- Medals #137 2
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,884 38
- Account age #5,907 #3,800,030
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #4,118 16pp
- Average pp #3,424 16pp
- Average SR #3,400 2.68*
- Average accuracy #2,395 95.16%
- Average score #4,141 973,364
- Total score #4,525 973,364
- Oldest #1 #491 Itou Kanako - Hacking to the Gate (TV Size) [Normal] (02-01-2014)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
2 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 1/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.