Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #380 4,783pp
- Global rank #380 #121,626
- Accuracy #398 98.78%
- Plays #315 40,636
- Level #152 100.14
- Ranked score #510 6,328,299,244
- Total score #377 41,855,975,325
- Medals #99 39
- Replays watched #180 5
- Maps played #554 3,724
- Account age #6,119 #3,868,680
- #1s #236 4
- Weighted pp #1,400 258pp
- Average pp #846 68pp
- Average SR #1,721 3.62*
- Average accuracy #393 98.72%
- Average score #819 5,717,105
- Total score #1,492 22,868,421
- Oldest #1 #912 LiSA - BRiGHT FLiGHT [Regraz's Light Hard] (11-09-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
39 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 5/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 6/13
Skill & Dedication 27/96
Beatmaps
The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.
Shoujo - Reminiscing 1 difficulty- Mapper
- Tar Curunir
- Status
- graveyard
- Hardest
- 6.10*
- Plays
- 19
- Favourites
- 1
- Ranked
- -
Shibayan feat. yana - Oznei Haman wa Mou Iranai 1 difficulty- Mapper
- Deramok
- Status
- loved
- Hardest
- 6.74*
- Plays
- 70,697
- Favourites
- 393
- Ranked
- 06-02-2022
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.































































































































































































































































































































































