donmiguel97

Joined 18-01-2014

Level 39 87%

3,967,050 score to level 40

Global
#1,146,725
Country
#3,406
peak #809 5 Jul 2014
pp
588pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
154,703,197
Hit accuracy
94.62%
Play count
1,931
Play time
40h
Total score
414,632,950
Total hits
243,402
Maximum combo
794
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
34
Highest rank
#1,042,729
SS
0
SS
7
S
1
S
66
A
114
About
read 19d ago
Playstyle
mouse, keyboard
Followers
20
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
1,156
Global rank, 90 days

today #1,120,559

Play history
Replays watched

Swiss ranks

Medals

34 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 7/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 4/64

Mod Introduction 6/13

Skill & Dedication 17/96

Rank history

17-09-2026 #1,146,725

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #7,654

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.