Michigrind69

Swiss #1s

Statistics

Swiss ranks

• pp #4,779 201pp
• Global rank #4,795 #1,651,772
• Accuracy #15,455 89.55%
• Plays #6,448 375
• Level #5,298 26.04
• Ranked score #11,785 34,152,329
• Total score #12,251 114,330,947
• Medals #132 6
• Replays watched #185 0
• Maps played #2,890 28
• Account age #93,293 #40,402,686
• #1s #237 1
• Weighted pp #4,886 6pp
• Average pp #4,765 6pp
• Average SR #4,792 2.10*
• Average accuracy #4,338 86.45%
• Average score #5,432 187,529
• Total score #5,441 187,529
• Oldest #1 #5,505 Tokai Teio (CV: Machico) - Teio Teio Teiteio (Extended Edit) [Sakura Bakushin O's Fuyo Stakes] (14-09-2026)
• Global #1s #9 0

Medals

6 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 2/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 0/13

Skill & Dedication 4/96

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.