cybrox_old
Joined 23-02-2014
35,990,895 score to level 56
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 3
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,470 0pp
- Accuracy #2,651 96.68%
- Plays #4,589 2,398
- Level #2,699 55.41
- Ranked score #3,891 406,387,637
- Total score #4,767 1,119,009,105
- Medals #133 5
- Replays watched #186 0
- Maps played #2,682 234
- Account age #6,633 #4,061,222
- #1s #235 3
- Weighted pp #2,894 48pp
- Average pp #3,369 17pp
- Average SR #4,440 2.27*
- Average accuracy #1,660 96.64%
- Average score #4,418 809,884
- Total score #3,603 2,429,652
- Oldest #1 #526 Jonathan Coulton - Code Monkey [Normal] (09-03-2014)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
5 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 3/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.