hldzm
Joined 24-03-2014
15,831,011 score to level 31
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,537 0pp
- Accuracy #778 98.37%
- Plays #6,058 781
- Level #4,895 30.13
- Ranked score #8,061 87,126,024
- Total score #10,385 177,918,989
- Medals #131 8
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,845 78
- Account age #7,044 #4,182,032
- #1s #237 1
- Weighted pp #4,765 8pp
- Average pp #4,577 8pp
- Average SR #5,379 1.71*
- Average accuracy #1 100.00%
- Average score #3,579 1,332,369
- Total score #4,228 1,332,369
- Oldest #1 #547 Tomatsu Haruka, Hanazawa Kana, Sanpei Yuuko - "HELLO!!" [Easy] (20-04-2014)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
8 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 1/13
Skill & Dedication 5/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.