Tamy17

Joined 23-07-2010

Level 55 73%

16,265,360 score to level 56

Global
-
Country
-
peak #289 3 May 2014
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
14

Swiss #1s

#1s
14
#229 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
173pp
#1,675 in CH
Average pp
15pp
#3,520 in CH
Average SR
2.16*
#4,670 in CH
Average accuracy
98.79%
#356 in CH
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
228,170,626
Hit accuracy
98.63%
Play count
3,303
Play time
63h
Total score
1,138,734,640
Total hits
323,850
Maximum combo
702
Replays watched by others
4
Medals
9
Highest rank
#864,751
SS
6
SS
38
S
16
S
139
A
27
About
read 21d ago
Playstyle
mouse
Followers
39
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
116
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #1,119,927

Play history
Replays watched

Swiss ranks

Medals

9 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 3/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 1/13

Skill & Dedication 5/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #5,975

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.