TimeWalker
Joined 10-10-2008 Was Neo1000
16,729,138 score to level 37
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,537 0pp
- Accuracy #2,944 96.44%
- Plays #6,107 728
- Level #4,288 36.36
- Ranked score #5,330 219,997,394
- Total score #8,328 314,050,862
- Medals #131 8
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,887 38
- Account age #25 #43,942
- #1s #237 2
- Weighted pp #3,956 19pp
- Average pp #4,283 10pp
- Average SR #1,833 3.56*
- Average accuracy #4,674 81.95%
- Average score #5,078 432,113
- Total score #4,631 864,225
- Oldest #1 #35 Ali Tabatabaee & Matty Lewis - His World [Hard] (22-06-2010)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
8 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 5/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.