Starcube_old
Joined 26-06-2014
19,714,606 score to level 43
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,426 0pp
- Accuracy #1,774 97.43%
- Plays #5,802 1,018
- Level #3,732 42.44
- Ranked score #4,753 276,904,478
- Total score #6,807 501,015,394
- Medals #135 3
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,706 213
- Account age #8,044 #4,579,570
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #4,770 7pp
- Average pp #4,587 7pp
- Average SR #5,362 1.72*
- Average accuracy #1,578 96.75%
- Average score #3,716 1,236,758
- Total score #4,285 1,236,758
- Oldest #1 #642 Hatsune Miku - Kyokou no Tsukiyo [Easy] (13-09-2014)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
3 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 2/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.