velvence
Joined 17-07-2014
23,838,449 score to level 48
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,537 0pp
- Accuracy #5,085 94.90%
- Plays #4,092 3,129
- Level #3,316 47.46
- Ranked score #7,711 95,421,672
- Total score #5,916 701,841,551
- Medals #132 7
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,659 264
- Account age #8,250 #4,665,651
- #1s #236 2
- Weighted pp #2,747 55pp
- Average pp #2,266 28pp
- Average SR #3,211 2.76*
- Average accuracy #1,304 97.20%
- Average score #4,962 493,039
- Total score #4,509 986,078
- Oldest #1 #660 Zhang Liang Ying - Di Qi Gan [Normal] (07-10-2014)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
7 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 1/13
Skill & Dedication 5/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.