gnuggi
Joined 07-10-2014
20,125,234 score to level 37
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,553 0pp
- Accuracy #4,334 95.41%
- Plays #5,910 933
- Level #4,306 36.23
- Ranked score #6,090 163,483,114
- Total score #8,363 310,654,766
- Medals #122 17
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,580 345
- Account age #9,133 #5,019,356
- #1s #241 1
- Weighted pp #4,723 8pp
- Average pp #4,505 8pp
- Average SR #5,268 1.82*
- Average accuracy #1 100.00%
- Average score #3,144 1,668,051
- Total score #4,010 1,668,051
- Oldest #1 #683 Sakurai Tomo - Tatta Ichido no Kiseki [Mel's Easy] (11-11-2014)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
17 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 14/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.