Trafalgar_98
Joined 16-10-2014
5,807,346 score to level 28
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,589 0pp
- Accuracy #5,649 94.55%
- Plays #6,310 550
- Level #5,157 27.60
- Ranked score #9,244 61,707,444
- Total score #11,493 136,572,654
- Medals #134 5
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,837 85
- Account age #9,246 #5,059,152
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #3,681 24pp
- Average pp #2,629 24pp
- Average SR #4,503 2.25*
- Average accuracy #1 100.00%
- Average score #5,082 427,834
- Total score #5,143 427,834
- Oldest #1 #765 BoA - MASAYUME CHASING [Desperate's Easy] (17-02-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
5 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 3/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.