Xoneris
Joined 06-12-2010
341,776,654 score to level 94
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 43
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,415 0pp
- Accuracy #3,043 96.36%
- Plays #2,160 8,147
- Level #738 93.22
- Ranked score #1,341 2,179,971,867
- Total score #1,930 5,748,389,514
- Medals #108 30
- Replays watched #175 10
- Maps played #1,707 1,262
- Account age #322 #597,388
- #1s #200 43
- Weighted pp #896 540pp
- Average pp #2,728 23pp
- Average SR #3,060 2.83*
- Average accuracy #2,482 94.98%
- Average score #3,407 1,447,753
- Total score #873 62,253,385
- Oldest #1 #67 Hisaka Yoko - Fudepen ~Ballpen~ (TV Size) [Normal] (22-01-2011)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
30 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 3/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 5/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 17/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.