marko0505
Joined 23-02-2015
143,619,516 score to level 87
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,412 0pp
- Accuracy #4,808 95.10%
- Plays #1,849 9,698
- Level #1,049 86.06
- Ranked score #2,409 954,944,000
- Total score #2,339 4,218,166,391
- Medals #106 32
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #1,478 1,547
- Account age #10,983 #6,057,862
- #1s #236 2
- Weighted pp #3,402 30pp
- Average pp #3,497 15pp
- Average SR #4,683 2.15*
- Average accuracy #418 98.66%
- Average score #4,094 988,952
- Total score #3,803 1,977,904
- Oldest #1 #1,043 KOKIA - Tatta Hitotsu no Omoi [Normal] (02-03-2016)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
32 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 5/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 7/13
Skill & Dedication 18/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.