M o o n l i g h t
Joined 25-12-2010
46,898,553 score to level 56
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 27
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,422 0pp
- Accuracy #137 99.18%
- Plays #4,543 2,437
- Level #2,714 55.22
- Ranked score #5,232 226,817,732
- Total score #4,786 1,108,101,447
- Medals #135 3
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,850 69
- Account age #340 #618,533
- #1s #216 27
- Weighted pp #981 454pp
- Average pp #2,452 26pp
- Average SR #4,363 2.30*
- Average accuracy #100 99.41%
- Average score #3,094 1,701,494
- Total score #1,029 45,940,329
- Oldest #1 #62 Tommy february6 - Lonely In Gorgeous (TV Size) [Easy] (14-01-2011)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
3 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 2/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.