Katarn98
Joined 21-05-2015
4,988,266 score to level 20
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,591 0pp
- Accuracy #17,786 88.45%
- Plays #6,451 408
- Level #5,983 19.32
- Ranked score #17,786 11,862,546
- Total score #17,073 46,311,734
- Medals #136 3
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,857 64
- Account age #12,178 #6,494,685
- #1s #241 1
- Weighted pp #4,841 7pp
- Average pp #4,681 7pp
- Average SR #2,349 3.25*
- Average accuracy #5,044 72.31%
- Average score #5,342 261,614
- Total score #5,360 261,614
- Oldest #1 #837 Imai Asami - Strawberry ~Amaku Setsunai Namida~ [Normal] (23-05-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
3 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 0/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 3/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.