orderofdeath

Joined 01-06-2015

Level 42 10%

32,025,255 score to level 43

Global
-
Country
-
peak #4,004 5 Dec 2019
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
1

Swiss #1s

#1s
1
#241 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
5pp
#5,069 in CH
Average pp
5pp
#4,994 in CH
Average SR
1.76*
#5,329 in CH
Average accuracy
97.84%
#881 in CH
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
228,916,496
Hit accuracy
93.89%
Play count
1,414
Play time
39h
Total score
488,704,745
Total hits
224,539
Maximum combo
727
Replays watched by others
1
Medals
12
Highest rank
#736,216
SS
0
SS
1
S
0
S
56
A
145
About
read 28d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
3
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
469
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #1,143,121

Play history
Replays watched

Swiss ranks

Medals

12 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 1/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 2/13

Skill & Dedication 8/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #7,818

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.