totobias22
Joined 04-06-2015
3,032,418 score to level 15
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,591 0pp
- Accuracy #11,187 91.52%
- Plays #6,786 73
- Level #6,490 14.25
- Ranked score #19,099 9,613,266
- Total score #23,102 18,317,582
- Medals #138 1
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,891 30
- Account age #12,338 #6,560,903
- #1s #241 1
- Weighted pp #5,439 1pp
- Average pp #5,434 1pp
- Average SR #5,177 1.88*
- Average accuracy #4,866 78.25%
- Average score #5,235 331,195
- Total score #5,263 331,195
- Oldest #1 #846 Imogen Heap - Have You Got It In You? [Easy] (09-06-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
1 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 0/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 1/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.