Silienzia
Joined 22-06-2015
33,745,129 score to level 46
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,386 0pp
- Accuracy #4,555 95.27%
- Plays #4,979 1,914
- Level #3,503 45.17
- Ranked score #5,163 232,368,303
- Total score #6,296 604,504,871
- Medals #126 12
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,515 401
- Account age #12,566 #6,652,838
- #1s #238 1
- Weighted pp #4,756 7pp
- Average pp #4,565 7pp
- Average SR #5,399 1.66*
- Average accuracy #1 100.00%
- Average score #3,783 1,179,044
- Total score #4,326 1,179,044
- Oldest #1 #869 Run (Fukuhara Kaori), Tooru (Yuuki Aoi) - Tomodachi [Easy] (20-07-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
12 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 3/13
Skill & Dedication 6/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.