KaffeeCorax
Joined 01-07-2015 Was Corax2005
761,782,746 score to level 96
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 7
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,403 0pp
- Accuracy #1,127 98.01%
- Plays #2,222 7,868
- Level #590 95.26
- Ranked score #1,361 2,136,790,441
- Total score #1,675 7,025,392,040
- Medals #112 26
- Replays watched #181 4
- Maps played #1,214 1,938
- Account age #12,679 #6,698,121
- #1s #233 7
- Weighted pp #2,462 72pp
- Average pp #3,987 12pp
- Average SR #4,909 2.05*
- Average accuracy #857 97.87%
- Average score #4,196 935,261
- Total score #2,553 6,546,829
- Oldest #1 #889 Ina - I wanted you [Easy] (19-08-2015)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
26 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 7/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 6/13
Skill & Dedication 12/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.