k2351999
Joined 19-07-2015
85,688,700,307 score to level 101
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 13
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,414 0pp
- Accuracy #828 98.31%
- Plays #189 54,381
- Level #152 100.14
- Ranked score #343 9,308,505,264
- Total score #384 41,242,490,519
- Medals #94 44
- Replays watched #181 4
- Maps played #360 4,792
- Account age #12,869 #6,794,697
- #1s #228 13
- Weighted pp #956 477pp
- Average pp #1,421 43pp
- Average SR #2,326 3.26*
- Average accuracy #1,008 97.63%
- Average score #1,293 4,138,658
- Total score #950 53,802,548
- Oldest #1 #1,036 eufonius - Paradigm [Nymph's Easy] (27-02-2016)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
44 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 9/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 3/64
Mod Introduction 6/13
Skill & Dedication 26/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.