Congratulationz

Joined 31-07-2015

Level 38 32%

19,854,613 score to level 39

Global
-
Country
-
peak #288 21 Aug 2015
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
1

Swiss #1s

#1s
1
#237 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
178pp
#1,648 in CH
Average pp
178pp
#135 in CH
Average SR
5.07*
#420 in CH
Average accuracy
100.00%
#1 in CH
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
170,143,989
Hit accuracy
96.63%
Play count
148
Play time
2h
Total score
367,935,387
Total hits
43,648
Maximum combo
1,475
Replays watched by others
5
Medals
9
SS
0
SS
4
S
1
S
4
A
4
About
read 19d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
2
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
115
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #205,218

Play history
Replays watched

Swiss ranks

Medals

9 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 2/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64

Mod Introduction 0/13

Skill & Dedication 7/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #3,348

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.